RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02157
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. The break in service between his transfer from active duty
to the Air National Guard (ANG) be eliminated.
2. The following corrections be made to his DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty:
a. Item 8b, Last Duty Assignment and Major Command
b. Item 9, Command to Which Transferred, from
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should have been transferred directly from active duty to the
ANG without a break in service. In addition items 8b and 9 on
his DD Form 214 are incorrect.
In support of his requests, the applicant provides copies of his
DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the
United States; AF IMT 1298, Application for Ready Reserve
Assignment and DD Form 1966, Record of Military Processing -
Armed Forces of the United States.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the applicants DD Form 214, he served on active
duty from 1 December 2009 to 1 September 2013. His narrative
reason for separation is Miscellaneous/General Reasons.
According to Reserve Order DA-00029 dated 9 October 2013, the
applicant was relieved from the Air Force Reserve Center and
assigned to the Ohio ANG (OHANG) effective 2 September 2013.
Special Order P-008-OH, issued on 15 October 2013, reflects the
applicant enlisted for a period of six years and was assigned in
the OHANG effective 2 September 2013.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PP recommends denial. According to AFI 36-3205, Applying
for the Palace Chase and Palace Front Programs, a members date
of enlistment is the day after their date of separation from the
Air Force. Service members cannot be associated with more than
one component at a time. AFI 36-3205 instructs both losing and
gaining units how to process Palace Chase and Palace Front
participants.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. The applicant submitted a
voluntary request for separation under the provisions of AFI 36-
3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, using the automated
Personnel Processing Application. Specifically, he applied
under miscellaneous/general reasons, so that he could join the
ANG. The discharge authority approved the separation and
directed the applicant be released with an honorable service
characterization effective 1 September 2013.
Item 8b is correct as indicated on the applicant's DD Form 214.
Separations processing has been centralized at the Air Force
Personnel Center. As a result of this centralization, all
active duty DD Forms 214 are produced at this center and will
have JBSA Randolph AFB, TX annotated in block 8b. Once the
board has completed its processing of this application, DPSOR
will correct Item 9, Command to Which Transferred, from USAFR to
ANG, State of Ohio, since the applicant enlisted in the ANG the
next day.
The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 October 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit E).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that relief beyond that already granted
administratively is not warranted. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 12 March 2015, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2014-
02157 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 June 2014, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 24 July 2014.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 14 August 2014, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 October 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01297
On 30 Dec 12, the applicant resigned from active duty due to completion of required active service and transferred to the Alabama Air National Guard to complete her military service obligation. On 9 Jan 13, she signed AF IMT 133, Oath of Office (Military Personnel) and NGB Form 337, Oaths of Office. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that AF IMT 133, Oath of Office (Military Personnel),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03528
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03528 COUNSEL: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected in items 26, Separation Code, JHJ, and 28, Narrative Reason For Separation, Unsatisfactory Performance, to allow him to enlist in the Georgia, Air National Guard. They found no evidence of an error or injustice in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01296
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed from Miscellaneous/General Reasons to Palace Chase. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The narrative reason for separation is incorrect as she went through the Palace Chase program under the 2014 Limited Active Duty Service Commitment (LADSC) Waiver Program. We took notice...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05658
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05658 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: a. Should the Board direct other corrections to the applicants DD Form 214, it would then be appropriate to administratively correct the address listed in item 19a. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02399
The applicant separated under the provisions of PALACE CHASE on 1 January 2012 with a separation program designator of KGQ – PALACE CHASE. The applicant separated from active duty via the PALACE CHASE program and the only SPD code for members separating after fulfilling their military service obligation is KGQ. The applicant separated from active duty with a debt of $2,468.98 due to an unearned portion of a bonus.
He be released from his PALACE CHASE contract and resignation from the Air Force. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement and other documentation Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, PALACE CHASE, HQ AFPC/DPPRSR, reviewed this application and states that applicant denies knowledge of recoupment action prior to separation; however, on 8 May 1997, he signed a...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04029
The recoupment action of his $11,581.56, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived. AFI 36-3205, Applying for the Palace Chase and Palace Front Programs, clearly states the member must repay any unearned portion of an enlistment or reenlistment bonus. The master military pay account (MMPA) shows he separated with a SPD code of KGQ which indicates the bonus is to be recouped unless he separated under Force Shaping.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00416
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial as the SPD of “MGQ” is appropriate for those service members who have not completed the required Military Service Obligation of eight years. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00011
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00011 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The separation code (SPD) of MGQ (Intradepartmental Transfer) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be changed to allow him to receive medical benefits. Those members separated under...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01051
DPPRS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded to the Air Force Advisory by explaining his options for early separation from the Air Force and how he arrived at his decision to separate early. The Board notes that airmen separating under the Palace Chase program incur a service commitment double that of their remaining active duty commitment. ...